Green Tree Financial Corporation v. Bazzle
April 22, 2003 (02-634)
return to
case listing

Case Summary
Respondents signed a contract with Petitioner that contained a clause stating if any disputes arose from the contract, both sides would resolve them through an arbitrator. When a dispute did arise, Respondents filed suit and later amended their complaint to ask for class certification. Petitioner responded with a motion to compel arbitration. The court issued two rulings ? one granting Respondents' class certification and one granting Petitioner's request for arbitration. Petitioner did not intend for claims to be brought in arbitration on a class basis. After the arbitrator found Petitioner liable and awarded the class substantial damages, Petitioner appealed arguing that class-wide arbitration cannot be ordered under the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. 1 et seq., where an arbitration agreement does not explicitly provide. The South Carolina Supreme Court affirmed the arbitration award and held that class-wide arbitration may be ordered when the agreement is silent if doing so would further efficiency and equity and would not result in prejudice. The opinion of the South Carolina Supreme Court is found at 569 S.E.2d 349.

To see the opinion of the lower court, click here.


PREDICTED OUTCOME ACTUAL
OUTCOME
Forecasting
Model
Expert
One
Expert
Two
Expert
Three
8-1 to Reverse 5-4 to Reverse 9-0 to Affirm n/a 5-4 to Reverse
VOTING TO REVERSE
Rehnquist
O'Connor
Scalia
Kennedy
Souter
Thomas
Ginsburg
Breyer
Rehnquist
O'Connor
Scalia
Kennedy
Thomas
Stevens
Scalia
Souter
Ginsburg
Breyer
VOTING TO AFFIRM
Stevens Stevens
Souter
Ginsburg
Breyer
Rehnquist
Stevens
O'Connor
Scalia
Kennedy
Souter
Thomas
Ginsburg
Breyer
Rehnquist
O'Connor
Kennedy
Thomas

return to case listing