Green Tree Financial Corporation v. Bazzle
April 22, 2003 (02-634)
|
return to case listing
|
Case Summary
Respondents signed a contract with Petitioner that contained a
clause stating if any disputes arose from the contract, both
sides would resolve them through an arbitrator. When a dispute
did arise, Respondents filed suit and later amended their
complaint to ask for class certification. Petitioner responded
with a motion to compel arbitration. The court issued two
rulings ? one granting Respondents' class certification and one
granting Petitioner's request for arbitration. Petitioner did
not intend for claims to be brought in arbitration on a class
basis. After the arbitrator found Petitioner liable and awarded
the class substantial damages, Petitioner appealed arguing that
class-wide arbitration cannot be ordered under the Federal
Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. 1 et seq., where an arbitration
agreement does not explicitly provide. The South Carolina
Supreme Court affirmed the arbitration award and held that
class-wide arbitration may be ordered when the agreement is
silent if doing so would further efficiency and equity and would
not result in prejudice. The opinion of the South Carolina
Supreme Court is found at 569 S.E.2d 349.
|
To see the opinion of the lower court, click here.
|
PREDICTED OUTCOME
|
ACTUAL OUTCOME
|
Forecasting Model
|
Expert One
|
Expert Two
|
Expert Three
|
8-1 to Reverse |
5-4 to Reverse |
9-0 to Affirm |
n/a |
5-4 to Reverse |
VOTING TO REVERSE
|
Rehnquist O'Connor Scalia Kennedy Souter Thomas Ginsburg Breyer |
Rehnquist O'Connor Scalia Kennedy Thomas |
|
|
Stevens Scalia Souter Ginsburg Breyer |
VOTING TO AFFIRM
|
Stevens |
Stevens Souter Ginsburg Breyer |
Rehnquist Stevens O'Connor Scalia Kennedy Souter Thomas Ginsburg Breyer |
|
Rehnquist O'Connor Kennedy Thomas |
return to case listing
|