Clackamas Gastroenterology v. Wells
February 25, 2003 (01-1435)
return to
case listing

Case Summary
Respondent brought suit against Petitioner, her former employer, alleging violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The ADA covers employers with fifteen or more employees. Petitioner, which employed between sixteen and nineteen people during the time that Respondent worked there, argued that it was not covered by the ADA because the four physician-shareholders should be regarded as "partners," not employees. The district court agreed and granted summary judgment for Petitioner. On appeal, the Ninth Circuit reversed, holding that a professional medical corporation's physician-shareholders are "employees" for purposes of determining whether the corporation has enough employees to be covered by the ADA. The opinion of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is found at 271 F.3d 903.

To see the opinion of the lower court, click here.


PREDICTED OUTCOME ACTUAL
OUTCOME
Forecasting
Model
Expert
One
Expert
Two
Expert
Three
8-1 to Reverse 9-0 to Reverse 7-2 to Reverse n/a 7-2 to Reverse
VOTING TO REVERSE
Rehnquist
O'Connor
Scalia
Kennedy
Souter
Thomas
Ginsburg
Breyer
Rehnquist
Stevens
O'Connor
Scalia
Kennedy
Souter
Thomas
Ginsburg
Breyer
Rehnquist
Stevens
O'Connor
Scalia
Kennedy
Thomas
Breyer
Rehnquist
Stevens
O'Connor
Scalia
Kennedy
Souter
Thomas
VOTING TO AFFIRM
Stevens Souter
Ginsburg
Ginsburg
Breyer

return to case listing